王茂斌的个人博客分享 http://blog.sciencenet.cn/u/wangmaobin 公司金融、公司治理、行为金融;对外经济贸易大学金融学院教师,中山大学管理学博士(2007)

博文

对我们最近的一篇英文论文的评论

已有 5287 次阅读 2011-8-2 16:04 |系统分类:科研笔记| 英文论文

我和华中科技大学孔东民博士及加拿大McGill大学Chun Qiu博士合作的一篇论文,发表在Journal of Business ethics第101卷第1期上。最近,我发现商业记者与专栏作家Larry Kahaner在其博客中对我们的论文进行了专门评论,很有趣。贴在这里,仅供参阅

 

 

转载至http://blog.mcgowanfund.org/2011/07/youre-in-good-hands-with-good-ethics-by.html#more

Tuesday, July 5, 2011
You're in Good Hands with Good Ethics 



            In the long term, good ethics pays off. But the question I grapple with is how long is long term?
            An interesting take on the subject comes from a paper titled Corporate Social Responsibility, Investor Behaviors, and Stock Market Returns: Evidence from a Natural Experiment in China by Maobin Wang, Chun Qiu and Domgmin Kong published in December in the Journal of Business Ethics.
            In their research, the authors looked at the melamine incident in 2008 when the Sanlu Corporation, one of China’s largest dairy manufacturers, announced that its products – baby formula and milk - had been contaminated by the toxic chemical melamine. They took these products off the market but it was later revealed that top management knew of the contamination but were afraid to recall product earlier because it would have hurt their reputation and sales. In 2009, three people involved in the scandal were sentenced to death.

           Using the melamine contamination incident in China as a natural experiment, it is found that neither the individual investors’ nor the institutional investors’ behaviors are influenced by firms’ CSR performance before the incident. Nevertheless, in the post-event period, institutional investors’ behaviors are significantly influenced by firms’ CSR performance that exceeds a certain threshold,” the authors wrote.
            In other words, while good ethics pays off in the long run, it pays off immediately when a negative incident occurs. We saw this with the well-known Tylenol murders in which Johnson & Johnson’s reputation remained intact despite the incident because of their strong ethical stance beforehand.
            This is an important finding because academic studies have often shown mixed financial benefits based on a company’s ethical behavior. The one bugaboo was the time frame. The authors note: "… studies on CSR (corporate social responsibility) and firms’ performance on the financial market report mixed findings even though some investors (e.g., socially responsible investment funds) explicitly favor firms that are socially responsible. Some researchers detect a positive relationship some discover a negative relationship  and others find no relationship.”
            They continue: “One plausible explanation for the discrepant results is the time frame of CSR activities: the costs of CSR are immediate, whereas many of its benefits are not realized promptly; therefore, investors with different time frames value firms’ CSR performance differently.”
            Takeaway: Good ethics are like an insurance policy protecting your company’s bottom line from unexpected disasters.

 
---
Don’t forget; you can become a follower of this blog by using your existing Google, Twitter or Yahoo! logon.

---
Larry Kahaner has been a business journalist for more than 20 years, a former Business Week Washington correspondent, and the author of many books about business ethics including: Values Prosperity and the Talmud: Business Lessons from the Ancient Rabbis; Competitive Intelligence: How to Gather, Analyze, and Use Information to Move Your Business to the Top; and Say It and Live It; The 50 Corporate Mission Statements that  Hit  the Mark, (co-author).


https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-607605-471093.html


下一篇:金融学研究,中国研究机构近年取得的进步
收藏 IP: 123.118.109.*| 热度|

0

该博文允许注册用户评论 请点击登录 评论 (0 个评论)

数据加载中...

Archiver|手机版|科学网 ( 京ICP备07017567号-12 )

GMT+8, 2024-3-28 16:17

Powered by ScienceNet.cn

Copyright © 2007- 中国科学报社

返回顶部